Southern David wrote:Given your political views, I'm not at all surprised that you cannot recognize logic. Socialism is inherently illogical. Its most fundamental tenets - of necessity - deny human nature and thousands of years of history. It is an unbalanced, unnatural and essentially childish approach to government. It refuses to recognize its own obvious failures, and its practitioners are blinded to the fact that every single time it has been tried anywhere in the world it has failed miserably. It is directly responsible for the most horrible atrocities of the past century, yet its invincibly ignorant acolytes continue to view it as though it were the source of all goodness and light.
Oh, come on FYI. You used to have some logic to your posts. But trying to paint an old style military coup as a beacon for democracy is a little farfetched. I know the right is on the down and out without any talking points. Surely, you can come up with something that has more substance or believability.
Now, I'm trying to remember, where exactly did I ever call Honduras a "beacon for democracy"? AGAIN with the shrill, over the top language. Geez SD - even the Honduran government wouldn't make such a claim. Same thing with trying to paint their governemt as "an old style military coup". That is pure leftist propaganda with absolutely no "substance or believability". If this is what you mean by "talking points", then you and the other socialists can choke on them.
History lesson: an "old style military coup" is when one or more military officers decide to overthrow the government and set themselves up as dictators at the point of a gun.
Political correctness lesson: only non-socialists can stage an "old style military coup". When socialists do it, it's called a "revolution" or even better, a "people's uprising".
Newsflash: the Honduran military did not act on its own. It took the action it was ORDERED to take by the legislative and judicial branches of the Honduran government. Their government tried to uphold the rule of law as much as was possible under the circumstances - those circumstances being that the executive branch had attempted to thwart the constitution and override the rule of law to its own benefit. The military did not set up a dictatorship under some clownish medal covered general. No, it left government in the hands of the civilians from whom it took its orders.
Final lesson for the day:
This is Shinola...
This is NOT...





